Learning Center
Navigating the IRS's Updated Voluntary Disclosure Program for Cryptocurrency
Over the past several years, digital assets have transitioned from a niche curiosity into a mainstream asset class within many portfolios. From Bitcoin and Ethereum to stablecoins and countless alternative tokens, millions of investors now hold cryptocurrency. However, the tax reporting obligations tied to these assets have grown increasingly complex. Many investors entered the digital asset space without fully grasping that these transactions frequently trigger taxable events, while others intentionally opted out of reporting certain transactions altogether.
Now, the IRS is making it unequivocally clear: digital asset compliance remains a top enforcement priority.
The agency is currently finalizing targeted updates to its Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP), explicitly designed to address digital asset noncompliance. While these revised procedures await final publication, they are structured to streamline the disclosure process while signaling the growing importance of cryptocurrency enforcement.
For investors worried about past crypto reporting, this development demands attention, but it should not induce panic. Depending on the exact circumstances, there may still be opportunities to proactively correct historical reporting inaccuracies before the IRS steps in.
Cryptocurrency Activity Is Highly Visible to the IRS
Historically, many digital asset transactions operated with relatively limited third-party reporting. That landscape is changing rapidly.
Congress and the IRS have steadily broadened reporting mandates for digital assets. The rollout of broker reporting on Form 1099-DA marks another substantial step toward greater transparency. With more data flowing directly to the IRS, cross-referencing taxpayer returns against reported crypto activity becomes significantly easier.
This does not mean every crypto owner will face an audit, nor does it mean that an honest reporting mistake instantly escalates into a serious tax problem.
It simply means that taxpayers with significant reporting issues need to recognize the reality of the IRS's expanding data-gathering capabilities.
Waiting in the hope that the IRS never notices may become an increasingly risky strategy.
Demystifying the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program
The IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program is designed for taxpayers who wish to voluntarily disclose past tax noncompliance before the government identifies the issue independently.
In simple terms, the program offers a structured opportunity for individuals to come forward, report previously undisclosed tax matters, pay the associated tax, interest, and penalties, and potentially avoid a recommendation for criminal prosecution.
One critical point must be emphasized.
The program does not grant automatic immunity from criminal prosecution. The IRS makes that explicit in its guidance. Acceptance into the program does not guarantee that criminal charges will never be pursued.
However, voluntary disclosure has long served as an important pathway for taxpayers facing significant compliance concerns because it demonstrates cooperation before an active investigation begins.
The existence of the program reflects a practical reality. The IRS generally benefits when taxpayers voluntarily resolve problems rather than forcing the government to uncover every instance of noncompliance through resource-intensive examinations or criminal probes.
The VDP Is Not a Universal Solution
A major misconception regarding the Voluntary Disclosure Program is that anyone who made a mistake on a prior return belongs in it.
That is not how the program functions.
The VDP is generally tailored for taxpayers whose prior noncompliance may have been willful. Under tax law, "willful" implies more than making an honest mistake. It typically involves intentionally failing to satisfy known tax obligations.
Conversely, many crypto reporting problems stem from entirely different situations, such as:
Confusion over complex reporting rules.
Incomplete transaction records.
Misunderstandings regarding whether a specific trade was taxable.
Errors in calculating gain or loss.
Reliance on inaccurate software or deficient exchange data.
While these scenarios require correction, they do not automatically dictate entry into the Voluntary Disclosure Program.
Choosing the wrong correction method can create unnecessary costs and administrative complications. That is precisely why having a strategic discussion with our firm is essential before taking any action.
Key Changes Proposed by the IRS
The IRS first proposed updates to the Voluntary Disclosure Program in late 2025. Those revisions are now advancing toward final implementation.
Although the definitive procedures have not yet been released, the proposed framework introduces several significant updates.
Among them are:
A six-year disclosure period.
A standardized 20% accuracy-related penalty for amended returns.
Failure-to-file penalties for delinquent returns.
Electronic submission of Form 14457.
A three-month deadline following conditional acceptance to submit required returns and pay tax, penalties, and interest.
The overarching objective appears to be making the process more standardized and easier to administer while giving taxpayers clearer expectations regarding timelines and penalty structures.
Until the IRS issues its final guidance, however, taxpayers must understand that these procedures remain subject to change.
The Strategic Importance of Timing
The most important feature of any voluntary disclosure program is inherent in its name.
The disclosure must actually be voluntary.
Once the IRS has already initiated an examination, received third-party information identifying the taxpayer's noncompliance, or otherwise made contact regarding the issue, certain disclosure opportunities may no longer be available.
This is why taxpayers with recognized reporting concerns should avoid waiting for an official IRS notice before seeking professional advice.
Reviewing your position now provides far more flexibility than attempting to respond after the IRS has already opened an examination.
Distinguishing Between Errors and Criminal Exposure
Another misconception worth addressing is the belief that every cryptocurrency reporting problem carries criminal consequences.
Fortunately, that is entirely false.
Tax law draws distinct lines between innocent mistakes, negligence, substantial understatements, civil fraud, and criminal tax violations. These are vastly different situations governed by very different legal standards.
Many taxpayers simply misunderstood how their digital assets should be reported. Others relied on incomplete historical data or inaccurate cost-basis information. Still others were unaware that exchanging one token for another could trigger a taxable gain.
Those situations may still require filing amended returns or settling additional tax payments, but they are fundamentally different from intentionally concealing taxable income.
Because every case depends on highly specific facts, taxpayers should resist assuming they have nothing to worry about—or conversely, assuming they automatically face criminal exposure.
Both assumptions can be entirely wrong.
Increased Reporting Means Increased Questions
As digital asset reporting expands, we expect many taxpayers to ask questions such as:
Should I amend prior-year returns?
What if I failed to report cryptocurrency several years ago?
What if I no longer have complete transaction records?
What if my exchange no longer exists?
Does every mistake require a voluntary disclosure?
Should I wait until the IRS contacts me?
The answer to almost every one of these questions is the same:
It depends.
Tax reporting decisions should be grounded in the taxpayer's complete facts, including the nature of the transactions, the specific years involved, the amount of tax at issue, available documentation, and whether the reporting failures were intentional or inadvertent.
There is rarely a one-size-fits-all solution.
Don't Rush Into Filing Amended Returns
When a reporting problem surfaces, the natural reaction is often to immediately file amended tax returns.
Sometimes that is the correct strategic approach.
Sometimes it is not.
If a taxpayer has potential criminal exposure, filing amended returns without first comprehensively evaluating the available correction options may not produce the best outcome.
Likewise, entering the Voluntary Disclosure Program when a taxpayer merely made an honest reporting mistake subjects that individual to rigorous procedures never intended for their situation.
The appropriate path depends on understanding the facts before taking action.
That evaluation must occur first.
The paperwork comes second.
Why Proactive Tax Advisory Matters More Than Ever
Cryptocurrency taxation has rapidly matured into one of the most technically challenging areas of individual income tax reporting.
A single taxpayer's portfolio might encompass:
Multiple exchanges.
Self-custodied wallets.
Staking rewards.
Airdrops.
Hard forks.
NFTs.
Decentralized finance platforms.
International exchanges.
Thousands of individual transactions.
Each of these elements introduces unique reporting questions.
When historical reporting problems are layered onto this complexity, resolving the issue demands far more than simply preparing an amended tax return.
It requires evaluating the legal risks, the available correction procedures, documentation constraints, and the long-term consequences of every available option.
The Broader Trend in IRS Enforcement
The proposed changes to the Voluntary Disclosure Program should be viewed as part of a broader trend rather than an isolated announcement.
Over the past several years, the IRS has consistently amplified its attention to digital assets through:
Expanded reporting requirements.
New information return requirements.
Updated tax forms.
Additional compliance guidance.
Increased examination activity.
Greater public education regarding digital asset reporting.
The modernization of the Voluntary Disclosure Program fits squarely within this larger compliance push.
For taxpayers who have accurately reported their cryptocurrency activity, these shifts underscore the critical importance of maintaining pristine records.
For taxpayers with lingering compliance gaps, they serve as a clear reminder that correction options should be evaluated before circumstances become even more complicated.
Securing Your Financial Position Moving Forward
The IRS's planned revisions to its Voluntary Disclosure Program demonstrate that digital asset enforcement remains a core priority. While the final procedures have not yet been released, the proposed updates are clearly intended to simplify the disclosure process while establishing more standardized rules for taxpayers seeking to correct past noncompliance.
The central takeaway is not that every cryptocurrency reporting mistake requires a formal voluntary disclosure. In fact, many do not. Honest errors and inadvertent omissions are handled entirely differently than situations involving willful noncompliance.
The critical step is determining which compliance pathway aligns with your specific situation before making a tactical move.
If you hold cryptocurrency and have reservations about your prior-year reporting, evaluating your standing today is the most prudent action you can take. Waiting for an IRS notice strips away your leverage, whereas proactive analysis allows you to choose the approach that best fits your facts. At Blumark Tax Advisors in Auburn Hills, Michigan, we specialize in helping high-income professionals and business owners navigate complex tax scenarios. Contact our firm to review your tax filings, outline your correction options, and implement a strategy that protects your wealth.
Auburn Hills Location
Office Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30 am - 5:00 pm
Bay City Location
Office hours: Monday-Friday 8:30 am - 5:00 pm